Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student's performance. Continual assessment such as course work and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this. Do you agree or disagree?

For many years official exams are the most reliable form to figure how students perform during their studying period. Nonclassical estimation tools like projects or workshop are less dependable for clear determination of real level. I agree with that, since tests or close
exam appraisal
Accept comma addition
exam, appraisal
will cover a wide range of knowledge and urge students to cover all of that,
in addition
, there is no place for cheating or plagiarism.
To begin
with, during the semester course, students will follow a specific syllabus with a wide range of topics and the most efficient system to encourage students to study these topics is through
exam
Suggestion
the exam
an exam
.
For instance
, if you ask a student to do a research,
this
will cover only one specific topic while
exam
will take a glimpse at each chapter regularly. It is a proper tool of judgment since it will make you study delicately and more thoroughly. Another problem to consider is Plagiarism, which is a serious common issue with assessment through continual education.
For example
, if you have been asked to do a poster presentation of a specific subject, it would be easy for you to find already pre -prepared project to present.
This
is as there are many open resources available that represent an attractive source for plagiarism and copying.
Therefore
, official
exam
is the most trusted tools of evaluation. To summaries,
exam
is a reliable manner of total coverage of the semester syllabus while continuing education is not an efficient way as it opens the door for cheating and copying. Supervised test will be a good predictor of student knowledge level and plagiarism is difficult. There should be more development of the
exam
system with frequent reviews and update of the question bank to make it dependable.
Submitted by oazijam on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • controlled environment
  • academic ability
  • creativity
  • critical thinking
  • practical skills
  • holistic approach
  • high-stakes exam
  • rote learning
  • deeper understanding
  • plagiarism
  • standardized measure
  • consistency
  • fairness
  • track progress
  • feedback
  • equitable approach
What to do next:
Look at other essays: