In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people earn. Discuss both views and give your opinion

It is argued that a

murder

must be committed by the

death

penalty

, while others believed that it can make the society

also

become a

murder

for the suspect.

Therefore

, it is better to keep the

murder

alive in prison.

This

essay totally agreed with the statement to give the murders a

second

chance

to live in the prison rather than to committing

death

penalty

because everyone has a right to stay alive and it will never enough to applying the 'revenge system' on

this

world. Everyone has a basic right to be alive, even if they are

murder

. As a human being, we have no rights to judge and punish other people with a severe punishment because it is GOD authority. They deserved a

second

chance

to understand the wrong thing they have done.

Also

, there must be some reason behind the story that could be unknown.

For example

, if people committed as

murder

by protecting themselves, it cannot be judged for the

death

penalty

because it will be unfair.

Therefore

, they deserved a

second

chance

to be a better man.

Furthermore

, committing a

murder

with a

death

penalty

is just a small part of 'revenge system', which I believed would never be fitted in

this

world. Fairness always be a reason. A

murder

just killed someone, so they have to be killed too.

This

thought was wrong. To illustrate why it is a wrong thought when there was not only one soul killed, it would not be fair to just kill the

murder

one time.

Thus

, the

death

penalty

would never be matched to the social system and have to be removed. In conclusion, a

murder

deserved to be given a

second

chance

to live their lives and be a better person because it is a part of human rights and the

death

penalty

will not be fair to everyone.