Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later. Some people think that having these people to give a talk to school students is the best way to tell them about dangers of committing a crime. Do you agree or disagree?

It is widely acknowledged that

crime

is a perennial problem that all societies face. Because of

this

, what is the most effective way to educate the adolescents has always been a much debated topic. It is commonly believed that talks by ex-prisoners should be held at school to inform students of the threats when a

crime

is committed. While

this

might work to a certain extent, I argue that there are superior measures of to curb

crime

rates. It is understandable why some people advocate making some conversations between wrongdoers and students. The key rationale in favour of

this

view is that reformed prisoners had real-life experiences so they can share a lot of difficulties they had to face.

Therefore

, teenagers could know more about tough conditions and how convicts are actually treated in prison.

Consequently

, the awareness of avoiding illegal acts of them would be formed.

Instead

of letting former-inmates talking about the consequences of committing a

crime

, I am convinced that there are more effective solutions.

For example

, policemen could be invited to school to communicate

.

Accept space

.

Because they are from the authority and directly manage prisoners, students tend to believe and follow their guidance.

Moreover

, parents and teachers

also

play an important role in preventing

crime

offences among adolescents. They should organize field trips to correctional facilitates for their children so that students could witness the actual tough life of law breakers. In conclusion, while it is necessary to train young adults from

first

-hand experiences of reformed inmates, I believe that several more effective solutions should be adopted.