Some people think that developing countries need financial help from international organizations. Others think that it is practical aid and advice that is needed. Discuss these views and give your own opinion.

It is true that many emerging countries are receiving different forms of
aid
from international organizations to sustain their development. While some people argue that financial packages are the best form of help, I believe that developing nations will benefit more from practical
aid
and advice. On the one hand, there is a body of opinion that pecuniary assistance might foster the growth of developing countries.
This
argument holds that these nations can spend the money building more schools and equipping hospitals with modern medical equipment. The corollary of
such
investment is a more educated and healthier workforce that forms the backbone of the economy in the future. Vietnam,
for example
, has been given loans with low interest rates by the World Bank. The government
has been allocating
Suggestion
is allocating
has allocated
this
money effectively to the education and health care systems, with more children having a chance to be educated and vaccinated at an early age.
This
helps them escape the vicious circle of poverty and improve their life expectancy.
On the other hand
, I would contend that global
aid
donors should be better off giving more pragmatic forms of help than financial packages. Experts in many fields should be sent to emerging countries to train the local workforce, empowering the local people so that they have
skills
Suggestion
the skills
and knowledge to make contributions to their countries.
Also
, advice on urban planning ought to be given to emerging nations where a growing number of rural individuals inhabitants are heading for cities for a brighter future, putting huge pressure on urban areas. These actions may reverberate across the globe and bridge the gap between countries in the world. In conclusion, I firmly hold the view that pecuniary assistance, albeit effective, is not the best option to help developing countries, and practical
aid
and advice should be given top priority.
Submitted by Bon Lê on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: