In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

This

modern era of fast-growing economies has indeed helped some outstanding individuals to become multi-millionaires or even billionaires. While I share concerns with people who worry about the detrimental effects of

income

gaps and want to limit earnings, I believe that successful entrepreneurs will bring more benefits to society. On the one hand, there are sensible arguments in regards to how the

income

difference between social groups at a high degree can negatively affect the welfare of society. People who struggle to find well-paid jobs may diminish job satisfaction and lose their career motivations. In more extreme cases where envy arises, serious social issues

such

as thieves, bank robbery, and illegal drug dealings establish. Introducing

income

thresholds

is considered

Suggestion

are considered

by many to be the solution. Supporters of

this

idea claim that only a narrower

income

gap will bring equality and

hence

, sustain the well-being of a nation.

On the other hand

, all the people who earn extremely high salaries run very successful businesses; they are backbones of a country’s economic system and deserve corresponding salaries. Jeff Bezos and his giant company, Amazon as a good example. Every year, Amazon not only remarkably contributes to the American domestic and international trades, but

also

create thousands of employment positions for the public.

Therefore

, Bezos’s earning is justifiable for his great achievements.

Besides

that, highly wealthy people can financially devote more to society. Bill Gate’s charity foundation,

for instance

, proves how investments can improve countless lives. In conclusion, I think that

income

control is a superficial method that should not be implemented and that having rich individuals are advantageous for a country.