News stories on TV and in newspapers are often accompanied by pictures. Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words. What is your opinion about this?

Recently, telecommunication companies have adopted various methods of transmitting information to the public. While some individuals advocate that the

use

of drawings in conveying details is effective, others contend that the

use

of words is preferable. Notwithstanding,

this

discourse will delve into both viewpoints, and

subsequently explore

Suggestion

subsequently explores

my own perspective

accordingly

. Admittedly, the proponents of the school of thought that the

use

of pictorial displays in transferring facts is more appropriate have their justification. The rationale behind their argument might be that pictures do not require any formal education;

in other words

, it is easy to understand not only by the learned, but

also

illiterates unlike either words or numbers. In Lagos, to epitomize, according to a survey carried out by the University of London, it recorded that 80% of adverts on television experienced 50% popularity

as a result

of the photographs used.

Conversely

, could the contenders of the view that the

use

of alphabets to communicate details, be absolutely right? Certainly, their vindication is much likely that letters give both full explanation and complete elaboration of the incidence. To exemplify, according to a research in a New York media house, it recorded that the

use

of words brought about a 15% increase in the level of understanding of the audience. Personally, I consent to the hilt that using sketches to transmit information is more effective because it does not require any formal education. To conclude, having explored both vintage points, I reiterate that the purpose of the drawings is more appropriate in the dissemination of stories to the masses.