In some countries, many people don’t have enough money to access the Internet. Should governments be responsible for ensuring that everyone can get access to the Internet?

Everyone knows that the Internet is a global computer network, which embraces hundreds of millions of users worldwide. I partly agree, that state should be in charge of making sure that people enjoy the chance of using the Internet,

however

, it isn’t a serious problem compared to hunger, poverty,

infrasture

and

healthcare

Suggestion

health care

. From my point of view, the Internet being a vast source of knowledge and entertainment is a necessity for

majority population

Suggestion

the majority population

. In fact, having a computer with an Internet connection is a bit like having all the books in the

worls

everything that exists anywhere

world

works

walls

under one’s disposal. The Internet is even better since it allows you to find the necessary information in a matter of seconds.

Furthermore

, it provides entertainment and keeps us up-to-date with the latest happenings in the world. Giving people free Internet access, the state can increase the level of education of students significantly. On the other hand, saying that the government should provide free Internet to everyone is a kind of

absurd

Suggestion

absurdity

. In a

worls

everything that exists anywhere

world

where we have to pay for basic necessities like food and medicine, demanding that the Internet should be free is a bit ridiculous.

Although

it is an advantageous

servise

performance of duties or provision of space and equipment helpful to others

services

, for many people there are far more pressing needs. For instance, millions of people worldwide still have no access to safe drinking water or electricity. Tens of thousands of people are homeless. And most of them haven’t heard about the Internet. What they need are the basic necessities of

life not

Accept comma addition

life, not

free internet. After analysing the situation, it’s not hard to see that the basic necessities of life are far more essential than the Internet. Of course, the Internet is useful, yet it isn’t indispensable. To my way of thinking, the state should use their resources to provide the basic amenities rather than providing free Internet.