Topic: Some sociologists say that, it is a waste of time for students to pursue secondary education for 12 years. It is better to shorten it to 9 years only, then go to vocational school to learn a skill applied in their jobs or go to university to get a degree. To what extent do you agree with this?

A few sociologists think that, it is not efficient to study secondary education for 12 years.

Instead

, it is better to pursue a program for 9 years, and

learn

Suggestion

learns

a vocational program to enhance practical skills, which can be applied into careers or to attain a universal degree. In my opinion, I completely agree with

this

fact, and

this

must be applied in practice.

Firstly

, the old conventional education system was introduced to cover an area of wide range. Indeed, the trend has been changed now, and the industries don't require theoretical knowledge anymore.

For example

, due to the establishments of many foreign investments, the requirement of labour forces is in high demand. So, it urges students to pursue their course quickly, and get ready for the work.

Thus

, it is mandatory to revise the time period of the secondary discipline.

Secondly

, by shortening the course due period, students can make use of the extra time by doing the things they really need.

Furthermore

, it is not an obligation to complete the secondary schooling fully.

For instance

, an individual can choose his own study plan in to learn during the bonus hours, which could reinforce his future career or tertiary education.

Therefore

, adapting to the situation is really necessary. In conclusion, theoretical knowledge is applicable only to a certain extent, and it cannot be used for making fortunes.

Lastly

, the learning course, must be enlightening the minds, and must lay a bright foundation for the foreseeable future.