There are severe social consequences to housing shortages in cities and only the government can solve these problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many people today feel that limited housing in urban areas can only be seriously addressed by governmental action. In my opinion, private investiture in
this
area will always be low so governments bear the burden of responsibility. Only limited support for housing problems will come from the private sector. Large real estate and construction firms are mainly motivated to generate the greatest profits and will
therefore
largely cater projects towards a wealthy clientele.
This
means building large apartments and homes that likely replace smaller homes, exacerbating any existing housing crisis. In New York City,
for example
, ambitious developers knocked down
government
housing projects and built luxury apartments and
brownstone
Suggestion
Brownstone
homes. These efforts push poor residents out of the city and
further
away from their work and engender a variety of social problems. The only realistic solution for housing shortages in major urban areas in governmental intervention. Governments can either build themselves or accept bids from construction companies. There are inspirational examples of public works projects in cities all around the world. The typical process is that the
government
will delineate an undeveloped or poorly planned area for new homes and accept bids from private companies. Since these areas are unavailable for unregulated commercial exploitation, the
government
holds power over the private companies. Once these projects are completed, they can house thousands of residents
affordably
that you have the financial means for
affordable
, which allows
occupants to
Accept comma addition
occupants, to
find quality jobs in the city and eventually move out of these housing developments. In conclusion, the
government
is the major catalyst in all housing solutions in cities. Governments ought to prioritise these efforts before cities become too gentrified and
this
hinders upwards social mobility
Submitted by Dave on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: