A part of the world thinks monetary options are the best form of support for the poor countries, whereas, the other party believes in non-monetary remedies. In
this
essay I'll be discussing both the point of views. Linking Words
However
, I strongly believe that while helping a poor country, both the approaches should be taken into consideration according to their needs.
Linking Words
Firstly
, the financial means of supporting a nation, helps in building their infrastructure. The underdeveloped countries can invest the money as per their strength and requirement. Linking Words
For example
, a state, rich in resources and fertile land can spend the donated amount for purchasing agricultural equipments like, transport, high quality seeds, pesticides, and so on. Linking Words
Such
investments not only give a push to the kingdom's growth, but Linking Words
also
generates employment opportunities. Linking Words
This
Linking Words
also
ensures that the currencies are utilised efficiently.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, the people in support of non-financial ways incline more towards creating the quality of living, in the below poverty line states. These types of helps are often related to situations that the current regime of the area might go through. Linking Words
For example
, under the conditions of COVID19, growing areas need good medical remedies like, hospitals, drugs, doctors and nurses. These approaches directly or indirectly saves the human race. It Linking Words
also
creates harmony in the globe.
To conclude, when it comes to fulfilling the needs of a needy country a mix of options should be presented. Money helps in the quantitative factors, whereas non-cash focuses on the quality of the living beings.Linking Words
zoyapervez21