Many people have suggested that young adults should undertake a period of unpaid work helping people in their local community. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this?

There exist a widely-held perception that youngsters are to engage in public services to improve the community they live in.

However

, to participate in

such

activities has benefits and drawbacks alike.

This

essay tends to discuss both views of collaborating with non-benefit community services. To work as a member of

non

Suggestion

a non

-beneficial communities may have positive effects on personality.

This

is because involving in

such

activities demands a considerable level of tolerance, attention, sacrifice and teamwork. To participate in a charity,

for example

, brings the opportunity for people to witness difficulties which other people are involved in with their naked eyes, helping participants to elevate their patience and understanding.

Hence

, wise is to consider collaborating with unpaid communities a method for polishing personality.

However

,

evidence

Suggestion

the evidence

is that being forced to devote a period of life for non-profit movements, especially in developing countries, can have specific side-effects since not only does it demands a significant amount of time but

also

possible is to lose career opportunities while young adults are busy with public services. The loss imposed on youngsters by military service in Iran is one of the most significant examples, whereby recently graduated students waste two years of their precious time, whereas they could use it to gain expertise for their future career life.

Therefore

, having

such

imperative issues, Enforcement of young adults to engage with public services is not appropriate. To conclude, stating that young adults should collaborate with non-paid public services, it is a commonly-believed idea with two opposing outcomes.

This

essay explored both advantages and side-effects of implementing

such

an idea in society.