Some cities create housing for growing populations by building taller buildings while other cities have opted to build on wider areas of land. Which solution is better?

Many cities today are expanding upwards to accommodate surging urban populations. From my perspective,
this
can help preserve nearby land for other uses and is a better solution than encouraging urban sprawl. Some would argue that tall cities present challenges for inhabitants and a spread-out
c offers
an ornamental sunken panel in a ceiling or dome
coffers
better quality of life. Condensed urban areas with lots of tall apartment blocks, like in New York or Shanghai, are famously difficult to live in due to the effects of overcrowding on sanitation, safety, and traffic conditions.
In contrast
, decentralised cities like Los Angeles and Nashville allow for the development of unique individual neighbourhoods, more space for residential construction and a reduction of the urban issues listed above. Individuals living in these cities often report greater feelings of satisfaction and many ‘transplants’ move to
such
cities because of the better living standards.
However
, those in favour of taller buildings can logically point out the resultant benefits for the area around. It is often hard to check the growth of economically important cities and that can lead to massive urban sprawl, as is in the case around Mexico and Tokyo. By building more skyscrapers, the surrounding area can be preserved or used in another way. Pristine natural lands can be designated as national parks. If the requires more food to feed its population, there could be located farms with fast delivery times.
This
surplus land could
also
be turned into quiet suburban towns to give residents the choice of raising a family outside the and still earning a good wage and having easy access to the cultural benefits of large metropolises. In conclusion, horizontal cities facilitate some positive living conditions, but taller cities make more sense in the modern world. It is,
nonetheless
, important to strike a balance and mitigate the issues caused by growing urban populations with quality infrastructure.
Submitted by Ngọc Hạnh Nguyễn on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: