Some people argue that the government should spend money on public services and facilities, but not on the arts. Do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, in every corner of the world, the Government is taking care of the facilities and services in the

nation

so their citizens can live easily. But some people claim that the official budget is only needed to be spent on people facilities and the arts need to be neglected. I firmly disagree with

this

statement. There are some reasons to spend money on inhabitant services.

First

and the foremost, the administration spends a large amount of funds on roads, hospital and schools which influence the life quality of the dwellers.

For example

, if any country have high standard schools,

thenthen

Suggestion

then then

children can get high quality education. Which has a direct impact on the

nation

development.

Furthermore

, transportation is only possible with a good road network

also

well constructed highways are required to save time during transportation.

However

, a large proportion of amount needs to be invested in public services, but Arts

also

play an important role in

nation

development.

Firstly

, there are many schools, colleges and other organizations which have only income through teaching and presenting the arts. If they will be neglected by the officials, the unemployment will rise automatically. Apart from

this

, different age group of people likes to participate in the art competitions through which they can show their creativity to another. To cite an example, only in the India, there are more than 50,000 arts tournament held each year.

Hence

, artists and organizers get some money by showing their creativity. To conclude, I affirm that the development of public sector is beneficial to the betterment of

nation

Suggestion

the nation

a nation

. It

also increase

Suggestion

also increases

the living quality of the citizens, but a small amount of the budget

also need

Suggestion

also needs

to be kept for the art.