Students generally prefer to choose the period they are supposed to study and the period they are free to have fun. They should be allowed to do their time management. Do you agree or disagree?

Preference for students'

time

management tends to choose restricted. It spreads widely as a typical timetable in school. It is agreed that the institute timeline should be monitored.

This

will be proved from the view of the immature behaviour of children and a growing punctuality mind.

Firstly

, the limited calendar plays an essential role in making institute kids focus on subjects.

For instance

, owing to a proper break

time

, kids can concentrate on assignments.

In addition

, a study conducted by Japanese scientist revealed that an adequate break can make a brain active, intense, and concentration will increase to some extent,

on the other hand

, people who didn't get certain

time

of the break, cannot stay in put on the subjects.

secondly

Suggestion

Secondly

, in

this

modern society, it is prioritized that delivering or handing in some r or assignments to one another on

time

.

For instance

, in Japan, in any of authorities make employees to complete tasks at present.

For example

, if the employee delayed for delivery an item to a customer, they may get a complaint from them because of the delay.

Hence

, kids should be taught a quality of being on

time

by the institution.

Therefore

, the controlled timetable should be set to establish punctuality for academy kids.  To conclude, the traditional timetable has a function that teaching how important of punctuality.

Therefore

, it is clear that deciding kids

time

agenda themselves cannot be supported, from the points of views that causing the bad behaviour and improving the quality of being on

time

. Because of

this

, kids should be monitored within restricted schedule.