Some people believe that the government should support the funds for the arts, while some other people suggest that the money should be used for public health and education. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some people deem that taxpayers’ money should be allocated for artistic values, whilst those who contend that subsidizing fund's authorities for healthcare services and school systems is vitally paramount. From my perspective, government expenditures should be given the top priority in medical and
education
.
On the one hand, the arts offer essential merits to the society in terms of cultural and economic development. Firstly
, art works reflect traditional values and cultural identity is found in paintings, songs, and dances that represent a culture’s shared beliefs
, religion or politics. Suggestion
belief
Thus
, by appealing an overwhelming number of local and international tourists year after year, public museums or art galleries established in the metropolis have contributed to the state budget. Secondly
, the arts have functions that enable each nation to boost fresh industries such
as the graphic design or the fashion design, which could open a myriad of jobs to each person.
On the other hand
, there are compelling reasons why governments should take investments for in healthcare facilities and education
into consideration. With regard to health, hospitals nowadays tend to need multiple facilities such
as ambulances, hospital beds, breathing machines in response to various types of fatal diseases and other epidemics. One particularly salient example of this
is an outbreak of a novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China in 2019. Furthermore
, money can be used for detecting and researching medical inventions. Thus
, by delivering them to faraway places, these countries are capable of obtaining competitive turnovers. As regards education
, authorities should finance in building more institutions in remote and underprivileged areas so that numerous students can have formal education
. Doing so increases the economic potential of the future workforce, which may enhance tax revenue in the long term and even attract more foreign direct investments.
In conclusion, we cannot deny that both views are advantageous. Nonetheless
, I am of the opinion that it is more practical to subsidize for medical systems and school institutes than art projects, particularly in third
-world countries with a limited budget.Submitted by Andy on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.