Government should dedicate extra funding to raising new buildings instead of preserving old buildings. To what extent do you agree with the statement?

A particular issue about architecture has raised quite a concern at home and abroad. Some individuals consider that
instead
of preserving relics, governments should allocate more extra fundings to construct new buildings. In my opinion, saying that tearing down old buildings is the best approach to regenerate cities not only carries a range of weaknesses, there are
also
other better countermeasures in
this
respect. On one hand, constructing skyscrapers indeed contain a spectrum of benefits. New buildings might to some degree offer more accommodations to address the problem of overpopulation.
Moreover
, giving citizens safer and more economical spaces for living as well as providing more job opportunities to societies while constructing.
However
,
this
practice is only a passive action to cope with those decrepit buildings. Since all the buildings are embedded with memories and
history
,
therefore
, dismantling relics will not only deteriorate the meanings of
history
, and
also
can be seen as a reaction which is a lack of assessing environmental consideration and can cause profound repercussions to the future civilization.
On the other hand
, there is a kaleidoscope of strategies to deal with historical buildings. For one thing, decrepit buildings may provide citizens chances to regenerate the economy,
such
as the revitalization of idle spaces, which can be served as galleries for entertainment purposes and
also
converted into restaurants so as to allure them more tourists to pay a visit. For another, these historical sites can be seen as iconic buildings, not only can these buildings represent local cultures, but
also
give both tourists and local people the opportunities to immerse themselves into the long-established
history
which can influence societies in a long-lasting way. In a nutshell,
although
setting up new buildings may impact people's lives in various aspects.
Nonetheless
, there are still other advantages of protecting
history
and preserving old buildings, ranging from offering chances to regenerate the economy situations to serving as iconic buildings to represent local cultures.
Submitted by a0955313835 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: