Some people think that zoos are cruel and should be closed down. Others, however, believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

It is often argued that menageries are barbaric towards creatures and must be shut down , whereas some agree to it being helpful in shielding them. In virtue of increasing the breeding , many animals are subjected to captivity without required necessities. Some

believe

Replace the word

belief

show examples

that confinement of

such

beings to be profitable as tourist attractions and crowd pullers. In my opinion, I believe that

this

is sadistic and

such

firms must be ended .Displaying animals as a form of entertainment has transformed itself into a racket over a period of time. These beasts are poached from forests, bonded and exhibited as features on family holidays .

For example

, these organisations engage in barbaric acts

such

as forcing lions through fire holes and using monkeys as gymnastic props.

In addition

to

this

, they are

also

deprived of proper care and basic nourishment

However

,

other trust

Change the wording

another trust

other trusts

show examples

that wilderness is the only home that these creatures can have.I completely agree that jailing the animal kingdom is tyrannical.

Wild life

Correct your spelling

Wildlife

show examples

sanctuaries with huge spaces can be used for conserving and viewing them .

For example

,

such

chancels are fruitful in acclimatization for creatures and will not be under to influence of penitentiary. It comes with the advantage of natural environment and colonization of these beings

thus

increasing the population. In conclusion, I stand firmly that zoological gardens are atrocious and must not be encouraged. These associations are bluntly money minded and look at

this

as an opportunity to increment money mafia.

Instead

planting railings in forests to monitor wildlife in large sanctums can assist support