Although many people value their public parks, this space could be for other purposes such as residential areas for the ever growing population or to develop business and boost economies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Public parks play a crucial role in urban life. They are very useful for recreations, exercise, events and

also

as playgrounds for children. They are the only places where we can find green in highly polluted cities. A

lot

of people argue that these public parks can be used as residential areas to support the ever-growing population or use them commercially to boost

e

Add an article

the

show examples

conomy. I don't agree with them, and I will explain why in

this

essay with some examples. Public parks release Oxygen into the air, gives a space for a lovely walk in the evenings, and

also

a

reat

Correct your spelling

great

spot to train your pets. They

also

used as a location for public events and different physical training groups. Senior citizens use parks to relax and breath fresh air. A

lot

of residents train their dogs in the public parks and

also

bring their kids for playing different games. These benefits make public park most valuable place in the cities. Using parks for different purposes as commercial lands or residential lands will damage the environment. Due to the overpopulation, a

lot

of trees are cutting down, deforestation destroyed all forest lands. Global pollution index is skyrocketing and affecting each and every individual on earth. Reducing public parks will make

this

situation worst and

moreover

, it is not the right solution for the scarcity of the residential or commercial areas. We need to start using the limited available place in a smart way, like improving infrastructure, building skyscrapers and smart buildings where we can harvest by using artificial lighting. Effective usage of wastelands will

also

be a great solution for

this

. There are a

lot

of lands which never support green, they must be used for spreading cities and constructing buildings. To conclude, public parks should be protected at any cost.