There is little control over the design and construction of new homes and office buildings, and people can build in whatever style they like. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

It is true that limited
regulation
allows people to design their houses and
office
buildings freely on
its
Change the pronoun
their
show examples
forms.
Although
some benefits of
this
can be seen, I am the opinion of that drawbacks exceed. One of the considerable benefits of having slight restrictions on construction of houses and
office
buildings is that it can be a famous landmark. Since fewer restrictions make it possible to create a unique appearance by adding colours and unfamiliar shapes, the uniqueness gathers people’s attention and will be well-known. Taking Casa Milà as an example, the originality of the house fascinate people all over the world and registered as a World Heritage Site. Designing houses and
office
buildings freely leads to making new famous architectures so loose
regulation
on its forms seems to be advantages.
Nevertheless
, I believe that drawbacks of limited
regulation
on houses and buildings are greater than its benefits because it can trigger spoiling the beauty of a town scenery. Without strict restrictions on
architecture
styles, it is hard to protect the beautiful view of a city, which usually involves consistency in appearance.
For example
, Kyoto sets a limit on
architecture
,
such
as colours and heights. Due to the strict restrictions, new houses and
office
buildings match the traditional townscape. Lax
regulation
possibly damages the beautiful scenery of a city that comes from the uniformity of buildings;
therefore
, the negativity of less
regulation
on design and construction new
architecture
prevails. To sum up, slight
regulation
on
architecture
allows freely building and can be beneficial.
However
, I believe that drawbacks are superior to their benefits because loose restrictions on building styles hinder the unified beauty of a city.
Submitted by curlyhairboihmst on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: