It is true that the human population has increased over the years in the ways through which we take up the land that was once called house of the wild 
. It is thought that people should spend a large amount of budget and human resources on taking care of wild 
, 
 the opposing point of view would be using 
 to serve human life. The latter view is reasonable, which means that I disagree with the former one.
On the one hand, wild 
 bring advantages and disadvantages. For one thing, they are among the most prevalent subjects spreading severe contagions. Now that in the natural environments, there is no doubt that wild fauna’s physical conditions can be affected greatly during the mating process, food chains, or parasites, which is incredibly dangerous if 
 come into connect with them. For illustration, the COVID-19 pandemic originated from bats in the WuHan area in China and caused damage to 
, 
, forming the disease spreading among the persons. 
, wild 
 grow up with significant ecosystem diversity, which offers potential remedies to treat human diseases. A perfectly good demonstration 
 worth noticing is that snake venom can help individuals resist poison when bitten, which is prepared into drugs to reduce blood pressure.
, investing in human life is an urgent thing. 
, we need to spend a huge amount of 
 and 
 to increase education. In some areas in Africa, children are not going to school as they have no subsidy 
, and the lack of food sources, freshwater, and infrastructure results in many evils in Africa affecting world peace. As for 
 a purpose of pedagogical/educational aspects, in developed nations, applying social media for advertising showcasing the living conditions of these wild 
 could be regarded as a remarkable solution to the problems of people’s poor awareness of preserving wilderness. Another essential point to consider is that 
 are high-level 
 that are more affluent than other species, so the focus on monetary and 
 issues is suggested to be put on 
 in advance. In brief, if 
 have inventions that serve their lives, they will afterwards return to animal protection. Of course, the higher possibility of every scientific outcome always requires more radical methods with expensive high-tech aids that will surely cost more 
. 
In conclusion, wild animal protection is needed in the natural ecosystem; 
, investment for 
 remains more crucial. Since the growth of the human population cannot be stopped, governments, 
 individuals, should be well aware of doing something about how much 
 and 
 can be invested 
  particularly current circumstances.