In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Nowadays, due to bad eating habits, the number of people experiencing health issues is rising more than ever before. In my opinion, higher charges on fast
food
would only partially improve Use synonyms
this
situation. Analyzing the effects of these restrictions on lower-income groups will prove Linking Words
this
.
From an economic point of view, the higher expense might seem sensible. Linking Words
For example
, populations in developed countries Linking Words
such
as the USA, Australia and Britain are increasingly overweight, and the healthcare system spends a large part of its budget on people with diet-related health problems. Linking Words
However
, most people who consume fast foods are aware of its health consequences. Linking Words
Thus
, apart from deterring people from consuming junk meals, additional tax on Linking Words
this
type of dietary products could help fund the healthcare system.
Linking Words
Nonetheless
, it Linking Words
also
needs to be considered which socio-economic group consumes fast Linking Words
food
as the main part of their diet. Statistics indicate that lower-income groups eat more of Use synonyms
this
Linking Words
food
than wealthier people. Use synonyms
For instance
, recent empirical research by the US government reported that many families simply cannot afford to buy healthy foodstuff or pay higher taxes on fast Linking Words
food
. Use synonyms
This
is due to the fact that many governments offer large subsidies to farmers who provide products for the fast-Linking Words
food
industry. Fruit and vegetables, Use synonyms
on the other hand
, are not subsidized. Linking Words
Therefore
, increasing tax on fast Linking Words
food
will have only a marginal effect on its consumption, as many people are consuming it because healthier alternatives are not conveniently available.
To summarize, Use synonyms
although
imposing a higher tax on fast Linking Words
food
could have certain economic benefits, it would have a negative impact on lower-income groups. Use synonyms
Therefore
, Linking Words
this
idea cannot be fully supported as it would only lead to greater poverty and families facing Linking Words
further
hardship.Linking Words
Submitted by dzonik1 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.