Genetic engineering is a dangerous trend. It should be limited. To what extent do you agree?

Genetic engineering is getting increasingly popular around the globe. The processing of hybrid

species

should be limited as it is said to be a life-threatening process. My view coincides with

this

proposition for a number of reasons which I will discuss in upcoming paragraphs. There is a myriad of arguments in favour of my stance. The most telling one lies in the fact that certain varieties of crops produced through

this

method could cause serious problems to the individuals who ingest them. Not only,

such

diseases could cause allergies, but these could

also

become a major cause to take someone's life.

For example

, many people these days face the problem to wheat allergy which is caused by ingesting the genetically engineered

species

of wheat which sometimes become much severe that could result in the patient's death.

As a result

, it is proved to be dangerous to use genetic engineering to produce profit-friendly

species

.

Moreover

, various animals that are produced using rDNA technology have

v

Add an article

a

show examples

ery short term survival rate as compared to the wild

species

.

This

is because certain mutations are caused in the body of certain creatures that might play a key role in reducing their life span. Resultantly, the production of new

species

with better features is not advisable. To illustrate, dolly sheep was the

first

sheep variety which was produced using

this

technology and was not able to survive for more than a month. To summarize, it has adverse effects not only on humans, but the

species

produced by genetic engineering

also

face deleterious impacts.

Therefore

, I

also

believe that the use of

such

technology for our own profit should be avoided.