Many people prefer talking about their likes and dislikes in public. to what extent do you agree with it?

As it is perfectly quoted that, "human is a social animal" describes rudimentary nature of the people who are always looking for the partners with whom they can share their feelings by communicating. I partially agree with the statement that person favour to discuss their interests in-crowd. I will argue my stance in the below paragraphs. To embark with, every man consists of different personalities influenced by genetical and habitual factors. Generally, human nature is divided into two which is extrovert and introvert.
Thus
, introverts likely to spend time alone or with few close people and entail intense energy to socialise.
On the other hand
, extroverts enjoy making new connections very often and do not hesitate to start a conversation.
For example
, my sister has few friends she uses to hangout repeatedly
instead
of making more friends unlike my brother, being chatterbox tends to connect with more people now and
then
.
Furthermore
, considering the situation in public, masses reaction vary depends on several factors. What sort of comfort level an individual seeking among the group will be responsible for the fact that how much he/she wants to open in a certain environment.
For instance
, people with the same intellectual and mental level can share their interests easily among each other as compared to the group of different mindsets, eventually,they will hesitate to open up to their personal levels. To conclude the article,
although
the basic need of mankind is to connect and share through communication, yet it depends on an independent individual how they manage to socialize in a different type of gatherings.
Submitted by jiya.naveed70 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • transnational problems
  • climate change
  • ozone layer depletion
  • pollution
  • collaborative efforts
  • pooling of resources
  • expertise
  • technology
  • innovative solutions
  • international standards
  • race to the bottom
  • environmental standards
  • capacity
  • impacts
  • national sovereignty
  • independently
  • economic
  • social contexts
  • international consensus
  • legal
  • political systems
  • enforcement
What to do next:
Look at other essays: