Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In

this

present world, some people think libraries need to be closed as well as computer

technology

can take the library place while others think it good to keep it.

This

essay completely agrees with the suggestion that keeps the libraries even if we have a new

technology

. In

this

essay, we will look at the

first

in the advantage of remaining it as well as the

technology

function regarding these issues.

Firstly

, the main reason why should keep libraries is a high-quality place and smart environment to work.

For instance

, for students and researchers who looking for a place motivate them and inspire them to study as well as to be around books and resources in touch,

furthermore

,that would encourage and support population to be aware of reading and regarding waste of the money, it is will be better to keep all books as an original site rather than work in convert it to

technology

copy which may cost a lot.

Secondly

,

technology

phones and laptops will never provide seats for a meeting.

For example

, the modern

technology

did not help society members to meet with each other and discuss the same passion they own

such

as the sports fans will meet regularly around the sport's book section in the libraries which may increase the chance to know each other. In conclusion, books are the sign to recognize any culture and history of the community. I recommended helping our child to know how much books are valuable by visiting the libraries and reading directly from books. It agreed that the libraries did not replace by any automation and we must work to keep it.