Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

In the contemporary era, there is a heated argument over the issue that officials should invest in rail transport rather than automobile infrastructures. A lions share of society favours it,

However

, the rest goes avers it. The following paragraphs would highlight my personal opinion along within an apt example. I see eye to eye with the central idea of railway development for various reasons.

First

and for most, the historical trend of industry revolution approves that transport via trains highly affects economic growth.

Therefore

, industrialization is almost impossible without investment in the given cluster.

Secondly

, trade-based businesses highly depend on large batch transportation.

As a result

, nations with competitive rail networks could get their share of the business. Adding

further

, trains are an affordable option for travels in middle- and working-class families. To substantiate, there is an epitome example of crowded wagons of India, mostly chosen by indigent individuals.

Last

but not list, railways in areas with natural landscape could be considered as a tourist attraction. On the logger's hand, some critics go against the above assertions. Constructing railways facilities including tunnels and bridges is almost impossible in mountainous lands.

For instance

, it is well known that Afghanistan has no railway network.

Moreover

,

m

Add an article

the

show examples

ost train has a relatively lower speed rather to other common long-range vehicles.

Furthermore

, passengers less frequently prefer trains due (at a fixed level of price) to its long time of travel. Hammering the

last

nail, I am of the opinion that railways development is the more efficient way to establish a safe transport network.