Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

In the contemporary era, there is a heated argument over the issue that officials should invest in rail transport rather than automobile infrastructures. A lions share of society favours it,
However
, the rest goes avers it. The following paragraphs would highlight my personal opinion along within an apt example. I see eye to eye with the central idea of railway development for various reasons.
First
and for most, the historical trend of industry revolution approves that transport via trains highly affects economic growth.
Therefore
, industrialization is almost impossible without investment in the given cluster.
Secondly
, trade-based businesses highly depend on large batch transportation.
As a result
, nations with competitive rail networks could get their share of the business. Adding
further
, trains are an affordable option for travels in middle- and working-class families. To substantiate, there is an epitome example of crowded wagons of India, mostly chosen by indigent individuals.
Last
but not list, railways in areas with natural landscape could be considered as a tourist attraction. On the logger's hand, some critics go against the above assertions. Constructing railways facilities including tunnels and bridges is almost impossible in mountainous lands.
For instance
, it is well known that Afghanistan has no railway network.
Moreover
,
m
Add an article
the
show examples
ost train has a relatively lower speed rather to other common long-range vehicles.
Furthermore
, passengers less frequently prefer trains due (at a fixed level of price) to its long time of travel. Hammering the
last
nail, I am of the opinion that railways development is the more efficient way to establish a safe transport network.
Submitted by sinaheli3 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Carbon emissions
  • Mass transportation
  • Traffic congestion
  • Economic growth
  • Regional development
  • Initial investment
  • Feasibility
  • Flexibility
  • Rural areas
  • Integration
  • Sustainable
  • Efficiency
  • Infrastructure
  • Commuters
  • Public expenditure
  • Autonomous vehicles
  • Long-term investment
  • Accessibility
  • Connectivity
  • Modal shift
What to do next:
Look at other essays: