some people think that dangerous sports should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree. give reason some relevant examples.

There has been an ambivalent perception, whether risk intensive activities ought to be prohibited or authorities should be given to the people to make a choice. Irrefutably, these kinds of games cause fatalities and serious health issues. So, the

government

should strictly abolish these activities. Evidently, there are myriads of factors in favour of restricting the perilous sports, the

first

preponderant one is that concomitant risks to life. To elucidate, risk intensive activities may lead to given chances of risk or

life -threatening

Add a hyphen

life-threatening

show examples

to people. On the paradoxical side, the

government

should not interrupt their feelings and happiness. Whether the sportsman is interested in participating in different sorts of activities which is fruitful for them, so the

government

should be given the chance to impose their talent. They can

also

learn a lot of lessons in their life after participating in these activities that involve

such

as patience, confidence, brotherhood or more.

Furthermore

, there are other economic benefits as well to the country. They can play different kinds of players and make a strong match with them. After all, they can win the match and take a huge amount of profit as a price. We can take the sharp example of India, Indian players got 3 lakh amount after playing a cricket match with Sri Lanka

last

year. In

this

regard, sportsmen earn huge amounts of money from different nations and make strong economic growth as well. In my perception,

that

is applies

Change the verb form

is applied

show examples

necessarily to make strict laws for the people by the

government

because of safety. The power should not entirely abolish these activities

however

, they should make some kind of rules and regulations for the safety of the individuals.