Companies should provide sports and social facilities for local communities To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some part of the society suggests companies build sports and social facilities for local communities. I consider myself to vote against

this

Linking Words

statement. Facilities that relate to sports and social activities are definitely important for the public,

however

Linking Words

, providing them is not part of the companies' obligation. Because they use for communal purposes, they are totally becoming the government's responsibility.

First

Linking Words

of all, sports facility

such

Linking Words

as gym,

for instance

Linking Words

Add the comma(s)

,

show examples

is designed for improving physical health and growing awareness to do physical activities for the citizens.

In addition

Linking Words

, social installations are

also

Linking Words

built to encourage people for spending time with the others, making new friends, and creating a positive circle in the community to fulfil the need of being social creatures. From those reasons, the vision of instalment the facilities is more relatable with the government rather than the companies.

Secondly

Linking Words

, the money for making the building costs an arm and a leg for the companies. Corporations' budget is usually limited and has been allocated to the business and employees development so that it cannot be expended to the other instalments. Cash to build that types of facilities should be established by the government as part of their expenditure budget.

Thirdly

Linking Words

, even though the offices could developing

such

Linking Words

facilities, they might be only provided them for their workers and not for the public. Because they use their private money so the installations could only be applied by their people and it can be able to be understood. To sum up, the mentioned facilities are necessary, but I disagree if the installation is done by the companies.