Throughout history, male leaders have led us into violence and conflict. If a society is governed by female leaders it will be more peaceful. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

History is full of

violence

and conflicts. Some occurred basically due to male egos and others due to certain disagreements. I disagree with the fact that male leaders have led us into

violence

and conflict and if the

society

is governed by the female leaders it would have been better and peaceful. Some points can better explain my disagreement.

Firstly

, history had very few female leaders as mostly the males dominate

society

. But if we take the example of Rani Lakshmi Bai, she

also

ended up into

violence

and conflict, though her fight was for justice and pride not for satisfying ego. Another instance is of the

first

lady Prime Minister of India Indira Gandhi had taken decisions wherein the

society

suffered

violence

.

Further

, males are physically strong from females due to evolution and because of

this

Add a comma

,

show examples

they had fought with courage and strength.

Hence

, history reveals examples where female leaders were over-powered by the male leaders as the

society

can be ruled by the one's who possess strength.

Also

, the woman always thinks with an emotional viewpoint. Whereas, males are mostly practical with their thoughts and they handle issues

accordingly

.

However

, the conclusion is that both the genders can cause conflict and

violence

and

thus

I do not agree on the fact that females leaders could have governed the

society

peacefully.