Some people claim that the government should provide free health care. Others think that the government will not provide the most innovative methods of treatment and it's better to invest those funds in education and culture. What is your opinion?

People often argue that the

government

should support all of the medical costs. It is believed that citizen should share the cost of

health

care

in order to regulate the waste of medical resources.

Therefore

, the

government

can integrate the funding to other necessary investment.

To begin

with, free

health

care

could lead to a waste of medical resources if the

government

did not regulate properly. It is because that the medical treatments and medicines are free for everyone, so some people might use it unresponsively.

Moreover

, if no proper regulated, medical system will reduce its service by using the heaper brand of medicines or reducing on medical equipment budgets.

As a result

, it can cause the reducing quality of medical treatment. It is clear that free

health

care

is not a good policy for citizens. I accept that the

government

should provide partly allowances for

health

care

so ordinary people can afford the medical costs. The resident should share the cost so they will not be wasting the medical resources and the poor people can afford it when they need it.

In addition

, because the

government

do not need to pay the whole funding on

health

care

, so they could use the rest of saving into other subjects,

such

as education or infrastructure.

Therefore

, the

government

can offer

the

Remove the article

apply

show examples

welfare widely for all the citizen. In conclusion, it is important that a great

government

should be able to provide completed welfare for their people, from healthcare to education and so on.