While old structures are an essential part of a society's practice, many believe that the government should destroy that architecture to build a new one. Due to some logical reasons I strongly disagree with the concept.
Firstly
, old structures like house and monuments are an essential part of an area's history and culture. These creations tell society's background and unfold their culture and tradition. Say for an example, the Empire State Building represents the strength and beauty of the NewYork's architectural revolution and adds a great value to the previous Linking Words
generation
. The current Use synonyms
generation
can surely be inspired by having an experience of visiting Use synonyms
this
place. By destroying Linking Words
this
, the new Linking Words
generation
might not know the greatness and science behind Use synonyms
this
creation.
Linking Words
Secondly
, these buildings can be an essential source of knowledge and income. While, by visiting these places, the school and college students can learn many traditional aspects, as well as, the owner can earn a huge amount of money by possessing an entry fee. Linking Words
This
fee can certainly be used to maintain those buildings. The old Khan Jahan Monjil in Bangladesh is now a huge tourist attraction and source of income for the government. Without the structure,many of its histories would remain unknown to the current and future Linking Words
generation
.
To conclude, the old buildings might act as a great source of knowledge and education, while, at the same time preserving its history and culture. Use synonyms
Therefore
, I strongly disagree with destroying those architectures.Linking Words
mubassirmhm