In many parts of the world, families were larger in the past because people had more children. Do you think there were more advantages or disadvantages to being part of a large family in the past?

Over the past century, household size in various places around the world has declined considerably

as a result

of social and historical changes. While I recognize some possible benefits of living in a big family, I consider it to be a serious drawback to

children

’s all-round development. On the one hand, living with numerous siblings would create several advantages.

First

of all,

children

always had other

children

to play within the same home so they learned so striking social skill and remarkable experiences that in their life.

Secondly

, they can

also

obtain an insightful understanding of family traditions.

Moreover

, when different generations live together, it is easy for them to support each other once they are in a hard time.

For example

, grandparents can take care of

children

when their parents go to work, and

also

younger brothers learned many things from their elder brothers. The larger families, the more problems they would be facing.

Firstly

, having a large number of family members in today’s world is very difficult to manage not only in terms of upbringing but

also

in fulfilling their basic needs. If they want to earn a greater amount of money, both parents will compulsory to go to work lead to

l

Add an article

a

show examples

ack of time to take care of their

children

.

Secondly

, being a part of a large family discouraged

children

from doing what they want to do.

This

meant that they did not have their own space for individuals’ interests. To conclude, regardless of the drawbacks and difficulties of having a big family, I think that growing in big families can be more problematic, which

children

can take on very important issues how to face with

this

problem in their future life.