WEALTHY COUNTRIES SHOULD ACCEPT MORE REFUGEES AND PROVIDE THEM WITH BASIC ASSISTANCE, SUCH AS FOOD AND HOUSING. TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE?

Nowadays, armed conflicts and wars are transversal problems. The consequence of them is the exit of an amazing number of

people

outside of their

countries

looking for a place where feeling alive: they are called

refugees

. For

this

reason, there is no doubt that

refugees

crisis implies being solidary facing their neccessities from a global common perspective. On the one hand, it is a moral responsibilty to assist needy

people

because they are not only

people

who need help but

also

are they suffering because of the uncertainty of their own future. It is not fair to deny

people

, who live in a horrible place surrounded by misery and ruins, a better life because we must be conscious we have only been luckier to not to be born there. For

this

reason, in my opinión,

refugees

should be provide of everything they could need by wealthy

countries

as long as their state economy can support it.

On the other hand

it is argued that helping

refugees

cannot only consist in giving them basic assistance during an indefinite period of time, but

also

a way to make a living. If

refugees

have a source of incomes, the social spending Will decrease and

this

avoids generating differences in treatment with the local population who have to pay high taxes to support it.

Furthermore

, there are those who believe that it is important to keep a stable ratio among foreign and local

people

in order to not to create a culture shock. Taking everything into account I strongly believe that wealthy

countries

should accept more

refugees

if it can be suppported by their economy and the ratio of population, being distributed the number of

refugees

among the different developed

countries

because it is a humanitarian obligation and, in a long term, I think it is possible to integrate them into a new society if the effort is made in a global sense.