When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. Do you agree and disagree with this statement?

Developing technologies in the country can lead to the extinction of its traditional skills and ways of life. So trying to keep them alive is useless. I fully disagree with

this

statement. It can be proved by a great number of

traditions

that survived even in highly-developed lands. China,

for

example

, is one of the most technological nations in the world. It mostly consists of skyscrapers and hi-tech establishments. It even creates a large amount of the world’s recent inventions in technologies. But even though, it keeps alive it’s main

traditions

and skills. And the main part of Chinese people really threat them. So we can not tell that the conservation of ways of life and beliefs is absolutely pointless. Another

example

is America. It is not a secret that the technological resources of

this

country are almost endless. Despite

this

Americans use their national abilities and

traditions

.

For

example

, main holidays,

such

as Christmas or Halloween are still celebrated there.

This

fact helps us to understand that technological development does not mean dying out of the lifestyle. In conclusion, I would like to say that

such

developed countries

such

as China and America prove that our historical

traditions

and our national power can not be replaced by technological progress. So I can only make sure that keeping them alive is not useless at all. From my point of view, if all developing countries would preserve their own knowledge, crafts and ways of life it will give a good

example

to other countries.