When designing a building, the most important factor is the intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is a heated debate about whether the

function

of the building is the most significant factor in designing a

house

. To a certain

extent

Add a comma

,extent

show examples

I agree that practical

function

is more beneficial.

However

, we cannot ignore the value of aesthetic aspects.

This

essay will discuss both viewpoints. On the one hand, there is no denying the fact that practical

function

overrides the outward appearance in terms of architectural design including the heating and lighting systems. The main reason for

this

is that no one is interested in living in an inconvenient and uncomfortable

house

, though visually appealing.

Besides

, under the modern guidance of energy-saving, architects would focus on generating an ecological

house

that providing considerable benefits in the long term.

For example

, citizens using the

house

with a modern

function

such

as automatic light can decrease the use of energy and protect the environment.

On the other hand

, appearance should be taken into consideration when it does not come in conflict with

function

, for beauty is always man's pursuit. A building of an individual's taste can provide a pleasant environment which is equally important for people feeling refreshed.

Furthermore

, a meaningful and unique architecture can become the landmark of a city or a country

such

as The Great Wall, Eiffel Tower which tell a story of its nation in a particular period or represent its spiritual values. In conclusion, I believe that the

function

of the building is the foundation of its appearance.

Nevertheless

, when the

function

is guaranteed, architects should take into the beauty account as well.