Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters. Do you agree or disagree?

Rich

countries

should provide aid to developing

countries

during a state of calamity. In my opinion, I agree with

this

statement because wealthier states have abundant resources and can boost their unity with these

nations

.

Firstly

, flourished

countries

have enough sources of funds. Natural disasters have severe damage to less-developed

nations

for they lack national preparedness, and budget allocations for disasters are poor. Thousands would perish if there is no immediate action done.

For instance

, when the super typhoon Yolanda struck the Philippines

last

November 2013, weeks went by wherein people went on without food, there was no shelter to stay, transportation was impossible, and communication was very difficult. Different

countries

from all over the world

such

as the USA

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

assisted the communities and the people who were gravely affected by the super typhoon by addressing their basic needs which included their food, clothes, and they helped build houses for families.

Furthermore

,

first

world

countries

and

third

world

countries

enhance their unity through

this

action. Relationships are built through shared experiences, communication, and helping one another. Reliefs brought by developed

countries

create bonds and moments with the underdeveloped ones.

For instance

, recent studies revealed that stronger relationships are depicted by

nations

that are helping each other than those that are not, in which,

nations

during calamities tend to be united. To conclude, during a natural disaster, states that are underdeveloped should be assisted by developed

nations

. Wealthy

nations

have an abundance of resources;

thus

providing aid to developing ones is beyond acceptable.

Moreover

, it strengthens the relationships between these

countries

, creating unity between them.