News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures. Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words. What is your opinion about this?

In present days news episodes on television and in print productions are often sustained by images. Some individuals are the meaning that those images have better effects than words. I have reasons to disagree with

this

Linking Words

statement and I will justify my viewpoint in the following paragraphs.

To begin

Linking Words

with, I definitely understand that it is easier for people to watch pictures or video clips but I think that power of the word is undervalued.

For instance

Linking Words

, the

last

Linking Words

surveys in Russia revealed that the human's brain perceives speech and

text

Use synonyms

better

then

Linking Words

visualized one.

However

Linking Words

, it is widespread to teach children with books and encyclopedia because it is a better way to give full information and it is easier for children to understand it. An illustration could be added but they are not necessary.

Furthermore

Linking Words

, it is impossible to gather enough materials to visualize and transfer information about the event at any time. Every picture or video must be supported by speech or

text

Use synonyms

to make it full.

For example

Linking Words

, try to imagine a video without any sound or subtitles. What can you get from it? These will be only beautiful sights or photo of places and you cannot

finally

Linking Words

understand what it means.

Furthermore

Linking Words

, it is impossible to express someone’s opinion through a picture and sometimes it is vital for the news to show it. In sum, I want to conclude that modern mass-information services are impossible to work without

text

Use synonyms

and only visual materials are not enough. I hope that in the future new types of transferring information will be provided but now the

text

Use synonyms

is the best way to get it.