Some people think that the best way to reduce the time spent in travelling to work is to replace parks and gardens close to the city center with apartment buildings for commuters, but others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

There are conflicting views regarding whether to construct apartment buildings for commuters in the city centre

instead

of parks and gardens can enhance the efficiency of forth and back to

work

.

This

essay will discuss both sides of the argument and provide my own opinion at the end. Those who advocate building more apartments

in

Change preposition

apply

show examples

downtown may put forth the following argument. There is no doubt that many workers are disturbed by long-distance commute.

Therefore

, if enough apartment buildings were constructed in the city centre, more employees would live near their workplaces, shorten the distance between their home and office, and spend less

time

travelling to

work

.

Nevertheless

, those who think reducing commute

time

consumption are unlikely to need simple removal of green spaces for apartments can

also

justify their opinions. Even though moving houses nearby offices do save transportation

time

, as mentioned above, it is not a suitable approach because more negative effects will be exposed. On the one hand, decreasing the number of parks and gardens may destroy the natural environment, which extremely hard to rebuild.

On the other hand

, living close to offices, people will be surrounded by invasion

work

atmosphere, which may cause stress emotional without enough private space, and

then

leading the

work

efficiency decline. In my opinion, sacrificed the environment to reduce commute

time

is not the best approach since

this

plan would backfire. More sustainable ways can be chosen,

such

as working at home, moving offices to remote areas, and taking different working hour measures rather than simply constructing buildings.