In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
Income, from salaries, is the primary source of livelihood for most families.
Although
Linking Words
a part of the population thinks that
this
Linking Words
is beneficial for the nation, there is a significant number who still believes that wages should be regulated by the authorities,
thus
Linking Words
limiting the amount of money one can make. Though the essay elaborates on both views, in my opinion, there should be minimum federal regulation on the amount of money that people make.
To begin
Linking Words
with, salaries are given by institutions to their employees based on their performance at work.
Therefore
Linking Words
, any hike or decrement in pay works in a ‘carrot and stick’ manner. Good performance is credited and any dereliction of duty, punished.
This
Linking Words
promotes the wage earner to push harder.
For example
Linking Words
, a pay-hike will encourage a software engineer to code more applications.
Moreover
Linking Words
, it generates healthy competition amongst colleagues which improves efficiency in project-work. One of the downsides to
this
Linking Words
is, it may create unnecessary and fierce competition among peers, leading to a stressful job environment.
Furthermore
Linking Words
, state control over payrolls is a measure to prevent
such
Linking Words
cut-throat competition. But,
this
Linking Words
is far from reality. Regulation over earnings promotes complacency in the staff and may lead to nihilistic depression.
For example
Linking Words
, an employee who knows that his income is going to be capped at a certain level will never try to increase his efficiency at his job once he reaches his salary limit. Government intervention
also
Linking Words
discourages the employees from acquiring new skills and implementing them at work as the amount of money earned stays constant. In conclusion, authoritarian control has little in its favour and the advantages of having no regulation over earnings of salaried employees far outweigh the drawbacks.
Hence
Linking Words
, I feel that there should be no federal control over incomes.
Submitted by skullyani on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • wealth inequality
  • economic growth
  • motivation
  • talent acquisition
  • consumer spending
  • tax revenue
  • redistributing wealth
  • market forces
  • income disparity
  • social stability
  • freedom of choice
  • meritocracy
What to do next:
Look at other essays: