Prevention is better than cure. Researching and treating diseases is too costly so it would be better to invest in preventive measures. To what extent do you agree?

There is no doubt that

diseases

have been threatening the life of people ever since mankind step foot on earth. Various prevention methods were developed to curtail the

spread

of dangerous

diseases

.

However

, these preventive methods failed to stop the

diseases

from spreading resulting in many casualties. In my opinion, it is of paramount importance to do research on

diseases

and discover a treatment to utterly eradicate the

disease

. One reason to invest money in the treatment of the

disease

is that it will put an end to a fatal

disease

.

In other words

, researching the source of the

disease

and its origin can give valuable information on how to prevent the

disease

from evolving.

For example

, when the outbreak of the bird flu occurred, scientist needed to know which types of the bird is the carrier for the virus and how it transferred from the birds to the human.

Moreover

, once a cure is discovered, the

disease

becomes less dangerous and people can return back to their normal life. Another reason to consider is that researching for the

disease

and finding a cure for it can give an insight for scientists on how to tackle similar

diseases

in the future.

Consequently

, the deadly

diseases

can be stopped before they

spread

between humans.

Furthermore

, the discovery of new

diseases

, their cause and prevention can be utilized for studies and research at the medical school to enlighten and broaden the student’s knowledge about the

disease

.

As a result

, students can contribute to research pertaining to

disease

to halt the

spread

of the

disease

. To sum up, despite prevention methods can be useful in limiting the

spread

of the

diseases

, I believe that treating the

disease

and researching the source of it can completely eradicate the

disease