Some believe that computers should replace
libraries
as the latter ones are a waste of money and valuable resources. Use synonyms
However
, others disagree with that notion. I totally disagree that Linking Words
libraries
are not useful as paper Use synonyms
books
are more convenient and effective in terms of education.
On the one hand, computers allow preserving more information while freeing a lot of useful space. Use synonyms
Moreover
, a modern desktop can store approximately more than 1000 e-Linking Words
books
and audiobooks. Electronic sources of information are not as vulnerable as paper and resources on these devices can be easily transferred in a couple of minutes. Mobility is another feature of electronic devices. Use synonyms
For instance
, anyone can hold and read more than 100 electronic Linking Words
books
at any moment while using laptops which is impossible in the case of physical Use synonyms
books
.
Use synonyms
On the other hand
, paper-based Linking Words
books
are more convenient in terms of studying. Not only do they engage visual parts of the brain but Use synonyms
also
engage kinesthetic parts. Linking Words
This
results in increasing the amount and quality of consuming information. Linking Words
For example
, scientific studies among 2 groups of students proved that students who used textbooks to prepare for exams memorised by 40% more than the other group that used e-Linking Words
books
. Use synonyms
This
fact is especially important for children and teenagers that study at schools and colleges.
In conclusion, I am absolutely convinced that Linking Words
libraries
should not be replaced by computers because by using paper-based Use synonyms
books
people can study more efficiently. I would recommend preserving Use synonyms
libraries
as there are no better alternatives.Use synonyms