Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however , argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for coming it ,should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishments . Discuss both these views and give your own opinion .

Many people think that every

misdemeanor

Change the spelling

misdemeanour

show examples

should have fixed punishments , while others believe that governments should investigate reasons for

crime

Add an article

the crime

a crime

show examples

before going to give a forfeiture to them . According to my point of view that authorities must research why scandal has taken place by the offender and after that give beating according to their crimes .

This

essay explains both these views and my opinion . Having a planned sanction for each type of offence is not a justifiable thing . If all type of breach has fixed retribution ,it will lead to hazardous issues in a country .

For example

,

although

a nation has only death sentence damnation for every

crime

so it is not a valid penalty for whom steal money for fulfilling his or her basic necessities , even though

this

penance is appropriate for murders , terrorist , etc . All in all , every country of ministry ought to find out which type of misdemeanour , the purpose of violation and other linked problems with that and

then

a judge of the court give chastising . On the other ,hand others argue that

this

is not a good justice and opine that there are so many criteria that have to research before receiving delinquency by any offender . There certain factors

such

as group or individual criminal activity , inspiration for wrongdoing , causes of transgression and another thing. The reason is that any criminal does a

crime

with intentions so that it should be found by lawyers , if a case for personal reasons , a judge give retribution like free community service , rehabilitation and high charge , even though he or she re-offence so they should be punished with restricted laws . My opinion is that every infraction has only one torture which is the worst decision , added to

this

investigator find different criteria for

crime

to illustrating inspiration , reason and so on and

then

an authority should give punishments to the wrongdoers . To conclude , there is a debate for discipline , one group believe that every felony has single damnation ,

however

Add the comma(s)

,however

show examples

opposite group disagree with

this

and claim that a government should decide different circumstance for a misdeed like motivation for the misconduct . I opine that the court of a judge must account for reasons for an offence before applying any charge to faulters .