It is more important for school children to learn about their local history than world history. Do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, one of the important lessons which students should be learning in their schools is

history

.

Although

, Personally I believe that, the past of the earth could bring a wide range of benefit for them, they must pay more attention to their country's past. the past of the earth, more specifically in, stone age there are a lot of experiences which is good for students to know. The

first

pictures on the caves can teach us how our fathers communicate with each other without any languages that could be more valuable for the developments of many languages.

moreover

, the

first

civilisation could teach to our children the basic structure of the buildings and cities, which help them to develop these ways as best as they can.

In contrast

, in my opinion, It is not necessary for any teenager to know the ancient

history

of nature but their own country's past can beneficial for them. the main

history

is about which what happened in your country and it is more useful for us to know and learn about our past. the teenager should be learning just about their past which is more touchable for them rather than the world's

history

and most of their time must be spent on some important subjects

such

as mathematics.

furthermore

, it is our duty to learn and teach them to our kid in some ways.

For example

, we can easily provide our past's culture by some creative and practical ways

such

as fashion designs. many of the clothes which are produced these days could be print by some historical texture and made these products trend. In all, many subjects in our

history

which we teach them to our children are not important than others, which can more efficient that we spend that to others subjects.

However

,

personally

Add a comma

,personally

show examples

I believe that we must provide our local past which students can deal with that easily.