Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do yu think might be effective?

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
To solve the matters of air pollution and traffic jams some people have an idea that the cost of gasoline has to climb. I do not subscribe to
this
Linking Words
perspective owing to the fact that it reduces the accessibility to some areas for a group of people, yet in my opinion, developing public transportation and the technology of vehicles have more yield. The fact
that is
Linking Words
really important is that some populations need to travel to their office with their own automobile because near their office is not the station public transport.
Nevertheless
Linking Words
, when the price of petrol is too much, communities, that have a low income, experience financial strain.
In other words
Linking Words
, whether they have to change their work or find other solutions.
Whereas
Linking Words
, the rich use it a lot because of luxurious goods.
Although
Linking Words
, if governments and car companies alter their ways, these issues can be solved. On the one hand, the infrastructure of cities has to develop, especially public transportation on account of the fact that
this
Linking Words
work creates a chance for urbanizations to commit to their workplace without their own vehicles, the main devices that emit a lot of toxic gases and generate traffic congestion in rush hours.
On the other hand
Linking Words
, when car companies develop their technology, they can produce a range of vehicles that are eco-friendly.
For example
Linking Words
, now, Toyota produces some hybrid cars that utilize little petroleum.
To conclude
Linking Words
, In my personal view, costly gasoline triggers a group of global inhabitant's financial problems.
However
Linking Words
, increasing the number of public stations and producing high technology cars by companies can solve the air pollution and traffic jams better.
Submitted by maryamkazemi968 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
Ensure clarity in identifying the main argument and counterpoints at the start.
coherence cohesion
Use clearer transitions to enhance flow between paragraphs and points.
task response
Further elaborate on examples to enhance task achievement.
introduction conclusion present
The essay presents a well-defined introduction and conclusion, summarizing the arguments effectively.
logical structure
Cohesive and logical structure makes the argument easy to follow.
supported main points
Main points are supported by specific examples, contributing to a thorough discussion.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • traffic congestion
  • pollution
  • deter
  • financially burdensome
  • lower-income individuals
  • public transport
  • availability
  • reliability
  • affordability
  • practical alternative
  • private cars
  • carpooling
  • ride-sharing initiatives
  • vehicles on the road
  • cutting down on traffic
  • emissions
  • infrastructure
  • cyclists
  • pedestrians
  • healthy
  • environmentally friendly
  • modes of transport
  • emission standards
  • incentivizing
  • electric vehicles
  • hybrid vehicles
  • overall pollution
  • impacting
  • congestion charges
  • high-traffic areas
  • peak hours
  • discourage
  • unnecessary trips
  • reduce traffic jams
  • penalizing
What to do next:
Look at other essays: