Too much money is wasted on repairing old buildings that should be used to knock them down and build new ones. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

There is an opinion that

instead

of spending a lot of

money

on repairing old

buildings

we can destroy them and construct new objects. I absolutely disagree with

this

statement, because some old

buildings

have a cultural value

also

they may be a landmark of places. The

first

reason why I do not support

this

suggestion is losing of history and culture. Some old objects may have cultural and historical importance for people. To give a clear example, if we do not care about old

constructions

,

such

as The Red Square or Big Ben the

next

generation cannot totally know the cultural heritage of past generations.

Thus

it is important to invest

money

in the safety of old

buildings

. In ,addition old

constructions

are one of the most important factors of tourism. A huge number of tourist travel in some countries because of seeing old

constructions

.

For instance

, most people visit Turkestan because there is a mavzolee of A. Yassaui. In ,

fact

Add an article

the fact

a fact

show examples

the government of Kazakhstan spend millions of tenge per year to save

this

construction. In conclusion, a big number of

money

is wasted on re-establishing of old

buildings

although

we nay build on

this

money

new and modern

constructions

. I do not support

this

idea, because it can lead to other problems.

For example

, we can lose our connection to the past as well as destroying the old

buildings

could decrease the income of tourism.