There are varying opinions on success. Some believe that a higher level of education is required.
On the other hand
, others argue that it is not necessary. I agree with the latter, which says that a degree is not a determinant for wealth.
Some person opiate that for an individual to be rich, he or she has to
their studies and have a profession. They make
claim on the basis that
level training is not adequate,
, the need for tertiary learning in order to acquire a fortune.
, they believe that studying more and become a doctor ,
, guarantees the person's comfort.
I agree that studying to have a profession is absolutely right, I disagree with the view that it makes the person rich.
, there are lots of graduates today who has no job and has no money at all
, some argue that attaining the highest heights of education is not an important factor to be wealthy. They make
argument with their points based on the fact that there are a lot of influential men today who dropped out of high school. Despite
popular individuals never completing their studies, they are now employers of labour. I support
side of the argument with my reason that skill
could be sufficient.
, these well-known persons have something in common and
they had a skill they were good at. All they did was to improve what they know how to do best and commercialized it.
, generating income, well enough to even employ the brightest of minds who excelled in school.
In conclusion, the essence of formal education cannot be argued,
, it is not determining importance to achieving financial security.
, I reiterate my support for