Some people believe that entertainers are more important than scientists. Do you agree or disagree? Support with reason and examples from your own experience.

It is argued that those who entertain people are far more paramount than experimentalists.

This

essay disagrees with the statement because it would be impossible to have

such

a convenient life without the inventions done by

scientists

, and

secondly

, they sacrifice their joy, enjoyment, and freedom to create something great for society.

That is

why they are far more significant than entertainers.

First

,

scientists

have improved our lives a lot by inventing technological advancements, small things that are of great use in our daily lives. The mobile phone is the best to communicate with people who are far by distance. The internet is a small part of their creation, contributing to many lives, including solving the problem associated with personal, social, or professional life. We can solve these issues by using things that

scientists

create.

That is

the reason why

Scientists

are greater than those who amuse us.

Similarly

,

Scientists

put much effort and dedication just to bring something useful for society. Typically to complete small inventions takes a long-time period, and to do so,

scientists

give them time to get fulfilled.

On the contrary

, users are not required to wait for and do much work for

such

a long time.

For instance

,

practicing

Change the spelling

practising

show examples

acting or dancing requires a few times when

scientists

have to wait until the positive result does not come. In conclusion,

although

some people believe entertainers are greater than

scientists

, I discard it as a point of view because of the timeline

scientists

have to give and the importance of technological advancements in life.