Libraries are irrelevant in the age of the internet and should not be publicly funded. Do you agree or disagree?

These days as technological advancements are getting more and more prevalent, it is widely concerned whether

libraries

will continue their prosperity in the future. I strongly advocate that

libraries

should be financially sustained by the government, due to the fact that they play an integral role in society.

To begin

with, the world is becoming more dependent on digital devices, which doesn't mean that people should cease the functions of many conventional places that serve the public.

For instance

, there are many individuals to whom the idea of reading books, studying and working appeals so much, that the eradication of

libraries

as a whole may lead to many protests and injustice.

That is

to say, not only will political parties suffer from

such

a situation, but

also

the nation of the country.

Secondly

, there are vast numbers of publishers who profit from their books publicised in

libraries

, which indicates that after closing them, paper books may result in extinction. People with poor eyesight, to take as an example, will struggle a lot with reading digitally, which denotes that

libraries

are not irrelevant in our digital world.

Moreover

, the shutdown of public

libraries

can

consequently

result in a drop in literacy rates, because many people will not be exposed to any paper materials. To conclude, I firmly believe that

libraries

are not to be closed, since it plays a fundamental part in our social lives and may account for multifold repercussions after doing so. In the future, it is hoped that

libraries

will continue working as they do nowadays.