Nowadays, people are older every day.
Similarly
, our environment is Linking Words
also
destroyed more and more. It is thought by someone that a country should contribute most of the money to medical research to help people's health Linking Words
instead
of protecting nature from destruction. Personally, I disagree with Linking Words
this
statement due to two reasons.
Linking Words
To begin
with, citizens need a great environment for living. Since nowadays, our natural resources were unproperly consumed to produce things for humanity, they are unpredictably decreased every single day. Linking Words
As a result
, our surroundings are not perfect anymore and Linking Words
this
affects human severely. Linking Words
For example
, illegal deforestation which can be seen often leads to the death of lives, including human, despite the advancement of the medical field. Linking Words
Therefore
, the government should not provide money only for health research.
Linking Words
Moreover
, nature is the original sources of medical products. The number of health-related things is produced from natural resources, from medicines to instruments. Linking Words
Thus
, if the environmental resources are not protected, medical research may not be able to develop. Linking Words
For example
, radioactive elements from mining is an important component for cancer treatment and detection and various plants are used to synthesize numerous types of drugs. Linking Words
Thus
, a country should see the importance of Linking Words
the
nature as well as the medical industry.
To conclude, in my opinion, I do not agree that the government provides the environment part less money than the medical part since they are equally important. Change the article
apply
Consequently
, it is better to take care of both branches properly.Linking Words
2547sand