Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines. Should parents be made by law to immunise their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunise their children?

Over the recent years, a number of vaccination procedures have become essential components of life to fight deadly diseases. While some people believe that parents should choose and select the injections for their children, I would agree with those who argue that the necessity of
such
vaccines for infants should be enforced by the law.
Firstly
, important procedures similar to booster injections should not be left with for an individual to decide as they are bound to carelessness.
This
is because a number of parents avoid the hassle of visiting doctors and spending money with the preception in mind that their babies would not catch the disease.
This
type of behaviour has resulted in big countries like India suffering from large scale epidemics in the past, like the Polio vaccine. A recent survey stated that the country would have never gotten rid of
such
immunizations if the government had not mandated the antidote.
For example
, the Health Organization of India took up a huge initiative of giving
such
injections at their houses, which helped its citizens.
Furthermore
, it is a natural acceptance of human to stay updated only with concerns that they are interested in or are enforced with.
For instance
, the census of 2019 stated that 70% of parents in India were not aware of the names of relevant vaccines which are needed for their children.
Hence
, their infants only received vaccines that were mandated by the govt.
Conversely
, if the government had not authorized
such
procedures for children and youngsters, it would be unsurmountable to vanish the proliferation of life-threatening diseases. In brief, I believe vaccination should be mandated by law as individual's decisions are prone to lack of knowledge and avoidance of related hassles which can have devastating effects on child and the nation as a whole.
Submitted by ash.fuji2018 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: