Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only Government and large companies can make difference. To what extend do you agree or disagree.

Nowadays, the surroundings belong to all societies members.

However

, governments have their commitments as well. It disagrees that modifying the

environment

is only achievable by the authorisations.

This

subject will be proven by analysing human being participation benefits and cultivation. It is felt by many that the

environment

belongs to society and its members.

Therefore

, every single member could have their impact.

For

example

, if people would have

this

knowledge to recycle their garbage before dumping them, it would help the authorisation and related companies to finalise the recycling process cheaper and faster.

This

example

clearly shows how people could help the government to amend the

environment

just by fulfilling a simple task.

Thus

, everyone is responsible for their world.

In addition

, individuals attribution to improve the

environment

cause a culture that could be transferred to the

next

generation. People by assisting the authorisation for maintaining the land, indeed, is improving the society's culture.

For

example

, in Iran, a couple has planted about 13000 trees in a desert for 10 years. Now after 30 years, that desert has been changed to a jungle where various species have inhabited there.

As a result

,

this

example

made it clear how individuals could make culture and encourage others to look after the

environment

. In summary, it is believed the

environment

is a subject that requires individuals and authorisations participation.

Also

, everyone has their impact to improve the

environment

with their approaches. It is expected in the near future, the

environment

gets improved by everyone to make the world a better place for all species.